| |
Return
to Publications
|
Larry Chalfan
Executive Director
Zero Waste Alliance
One World Trade Center
121 S.W. Salmon St., Suite 210
Portland, OR 97204
Tel: 503-279-9383 Fax:
503-279-9381
lchalfan@zerowaste.org
(Former CEO Oki Semiconductor Manufacturing) |
|
SUMMARY
Oki
Semiconductor Manufacturing was an early adopter of the ISO 14001
standard. Internal resources
were used to develop a system based on the essence of the ISO 14001
requirements which resulted in many economic, organizational and
environmental benefits.
KEY
WORDS/PHRASES: Benefits, beyond-compliance, environmental
management systems, empowerment, The Natural Step
BACKGROUND
Oki
Semiconductor Manufacturing was established in 1989 as a subsidiary of Oki
Electric Industry Co. Ltd. At
that time land was purchased and a manufacturing plant was constructed.
There were approximately 135 people employed at the plant producing DRAM
and automobile engine control microcontroller integrated circuits. The company was developed with a focus on the customers,
quality and employee involvement. Our original long-term goals included
quality, on-time delivery, low cost manufacturing, being a good community
member, creating an enjoyable workplace and "to be totally
responsible to the environment."
As OKI’s CEO, I took that last goal seriously.
Original
Drivers
In
the early years we were in the regulatory compliance mode like most other
companies. We had a very good record and were not having spills or fines
and were proud of our accomplishments.
Still, we had our problems. Our Environmental and Safety Manager
was over burdened and working as a "Lone Ranger".
She was often at cross purposes with the engineering, production
and purchasing managers. They each had things they wanted to do that were not allowed
or would affect our fees. In
one case, in order to meet his cost saving goals, a purchasing manager
wanted to buy certain chemicals in 55 gallon drums instead of 5 gallon
containers. This would have
changed our status so that it would cost us an additional $20,000 per year
in permit fees. Obviously,
when people with different agendas are working independently many mistakes
can be made.
In
January 1995 we decided to implement an ISO 14001 compliant environmental
management system to improve the situation.
Our primary goals were to improve teamwork by involving all
employees in the system and to further reduce our risks of environmental
accidents. We had registered
our quality system to the ISO 9002 standard in 1994 and found it to be
very effective not only in managing quality, but also in managing the
system itself. We expected
the same to be true for the ISO 14001 standard. Our original goals did not
include becoming certified to the standard.
IMPLEMENTATION
At
the time we began, the ISO 14001 standard was in final draft form.
No one had become certified and no "how-to" books or
knowledgeable consultants were available.
Our progress was slow because we had to study each sentence and
determine the essence of its requirements.
Progress was also slow because not all managers had "bought
in" to the new initiative. The rate of progress increased
significantly when the development of the EMS was given credibility
through its inclusion in our objectives management system.
Initially
a steering committee including the environmental and safety manager, the
president and key senior managers was formed.
Working committees were formed that included all managers and key
personnel. We began with the
development of an environmental policy through a consensus process.
The final policy was worded using "We the employees…"
to help in the engagement of all people.
The
initial aspects and impacts analysis was unexpectedly painful and time
consuming. We struggled to
determine the criteria and then to get all people to have similar
understanding of the unfamiliar terms.
A large database was developed that included aspects, impacts and a
rating and ranking system. All
managers and engineers were involved to do the analysis for their
respective areas. This
analysis found over 400 aspects from our activities which included
manufacturing processes, landscape management, filbert orchard and wheat
field farming and even employee commuting.
Each aspect was evaluated by its real or possible affects on air,
water, and the ground.
It
is interesting to note that our significant aspects and their objectives
and targets and programs were much more effective than Oregon's Toxic Use
Reduction and Hazardous Waste Reduction Act.
In some cases the objectives were the same, but when the goal was
to achieve "our" objectives and targets" our people were
much more highly motivated. This was another demonstration of the
effectiveness of getting people involved as opposed to a top down decree.
A
kick-off meeting presentation was very effective in mobilizing the
workforce. The global
environmental situation was explained along with actions we each could
take to help reduce the problems. The
company's commitment to ISO 14001 compliance was extremely well received,
perhaps partially because the people were Oregonians.
Through training and the understanding the potential consequences
of their actions, the employees accepted the desired feeling of direct
responsibility for the company’s environmental performance.
This
involvement of all employees was an enormous source of energy and ideas
for improvements. The
existing suggestion and quality circle team systems became avenues through
which the majority of employees became active in helping find additional
improvements. Later a system
of understanding from Sweden called The Natural Step was used to create a
shared mental model of the problem and a path to improvement. The
understanding of The Natural Step's system conditions for living
sustainably with the environment further cemented the commitment of the
employees.
The
Natural Step System Conditions were later formally applied as additional
tools in the aspects and impacts analysis and new product and new process
analyses. By including them
on checklists we were more certain to be considering the appropriate
factors when making decisions. As
an example, we replaced one industrially acceptable chemical with another
and reduced the usage from 32,000 lbs. per year to 575 lbs.
In addition, the resulting hazardous waste was reduced by 57,000
lbs. We thought that we had a
perfect example of "beginning of the pipe" improvement.
After learning about The Natural Step and applying its conditions
we realized that small amounts of the new chemical might have been more
hazardous and persistent in the environment than the original one. A later
check confirmed that this was not the case, but we hadn't even considered
the possibility because they were both readily available industrial
chemicals.
RESULTS
The
environmental management system was greatly improved by having more
structured audits, better documentation, a formal integrated root-cause
corrective action system, and appropriate records and internal audits and
reviews.
Environmental
impacts and risks were reduced significantly through reduced purchases of
toxic materials, reduced generation of toxic waste; improved reuse,
reclaim and recycling; reduction of solid waste and reduction of the use
of natural resources.
Organizational
improvements included better teamwork through the involvement of all
employees and a heightened awareness of how each person's actions may
affect the environment. After training, employees worked diligently to
seek out risks, reduce hazardous and solid waste, find ways to reuse or
recycle everything possible and to reduce the use of natural resources.
Employee volunteer projects saved 3.2M gals of water and reduced solid
waste by 75%. One of the programs of the ISO 14001 system resulted in the
modification of a process to reduce a high use toxic by approximately 98%
and the related toxic waste by 77%, saving nearly $60,000 per year.
People's
pride in their company resulted in very high morale. This came especially clear when the plant was closed in 1998
by the parent company. There
was no vandalism and many people expressed their positive feelings about
having been able to have worked for a company that cares about the
environment. An unmeasured benefit is that in 1998 before the plant was
closed it was running far ahead of budget by nearly reaching its annual
profit goal in the first five months of the year.
Improved teamwork and morale is credited with the excellent
performance.
Economic
benefits included reduced chemical costs, reduced hazardous waste
expenses, reduced analysis costs, and even lowered insurance premiums.
The annual savings of $80,000 resulted in a six-month
return-on-investment on out of pocket costs for development and
certification of the system. A
summary of financial benefits is shown in Table 1.
We
were very pleased to be ready when much later our parent company required
all organizations to become ISO 14001 certified.
CONCLUSION
Like
many journeys, the path led to unexpected places. The economic, organizational and environmental benefits
listed above are far greater than were ever expected at the beginning.
Tremendous power was released by the full involvement of all people
in the organization. Environmental
impacts were reduced more than expected and the resulting morale and
commitment was overwhelming.
A
valuable element of the ISO 14001 certification system is third party
audits. They act as a
conscience for the organization so that no matter how pressing the current
business issues may be, the EMS won't be compromised.
A
win-win situation was created between the company, the environment and our
grandchildren. For me personally the journey led to a deep interest in
sustainable development - development that balances economic, social and
environmental issues.
Our
people threw a great party!
Table
1
Annual Savings
| 1. |
Reduction
of the usage of hazardous materials |
|
|
|
|
- Chemicals reduced by
(Replacement chemical)
- Chemical usage reduction
|
32,000
lbs
575 lbs
32,825 gal |
100%
+1.8%
22% |
$3,400
-$607
$5,051 |
| 2. |
Reduction
of the generation of hazardous wastes |
|
|
|
|
- Overall Reduction from 1996
through 1997
|
57,417
lbs |
|
$54,427 |
| 3. |
Reduction
of non-hazardous solid waste generated |
|
|
|
|
- Garbage reduced from 416 to 265
cu. yds/year
|
151
cu. yds
|
36% |
$1,179 |
| 4. |
Reuse,
Reclaim and Recycling |
|
|
|
|
- Recycled/reused, some paid, some
sold
|
42,101
lbs |
|
$3,500 |
| 5. |
Reduction
of the use of natural resources |
|
|
|
|
- Water usage reduced in processes
and irrigation
|
3,600K
gal |
|
$5,600 |
| 6. |
Other
Financial Benefits |
|
|
|
|
- Reduction of Insurance costs,
annual
- Waste water permit - reduced
sampling and reporting
|
|
|
$3,900
$3,840 |
|
Total
Tracked Savings |
|
|
$80,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
| ISO
14001 development and registration costs |
|
|
|
|
- Training, temporary help and
certification audits
|
|
|
$38,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Net
First Year Savings |
|
|
$41,790 |
top
of page
|
|